The Ecological Impact of Native Americans in Eastern North America :: American America History

The ecologic Impact of Native the Statesns in Eastern northwards AmericaShetler, in the book Seeds of Change Five Hundred Years Since Columbus, supports the myth that the refreshed mankind was an unspoiled paradise by stating that Native population were unmixed in the beautify, living as natural elements of the ecosphere. Their worldwas a world of barely perceptible human disturbances(Shetler 1991). Sale contends that the Indians had a benign printing and refering to them as the Ecological Indian.(Sale 1990) These are fine examples of the new commission of portraying the Native Americans as Noble Savages. There is no fountainhead that the Europeans had a more obvious influence on the landscape than the American Indian, simply the notion that the Native Americans were transparent or benign to the landscape is an absurd over exaggeration. When in fact, twenty million indigenous people were hunting gathering, burning, tilling, and otherwise managing North America(Anderson 19 91). It is not the pattern of this piece of music to claim the American Indians did more harm to the environment than the European Settlers, but one important notion that must be understood forward proceeding is that even though a landscape may have the demeanor _or_ semblance green it is not in indicator of natural ecology. It is the intention of this paper to show that the Native Americans had a significant impact on the ecology of the Eastern North American Landscape, which is unknown to numerous scholars. fossil records from 12,000 years ago show the appearance of the Large Mammals followed by Paleoindian in Eastern North America. Another piece of the fossil record shows that the appearance of Paleoindian brought about the disappearance of the large mammals. Some people feel that, in that location is evidence to suggest that rapacious hunting practice of the paleohunters in North and South America 12,000 years ago may have causedThe destruction of the very animals they hunted (Powell 1987). The evidence Powell suggests is that the extermination of a large mammal is usually followed by the appearance of humans in the fossil record. This conjugation is not only seen in the fossil records of North and South America but Europe and Asia as well. Powell shows that as human populations increased topical anaesthetic extinctions of large mammals occurred. This was probably due to the fact that there were not many predators that could hunt the large mammals except man. For this reason it is also highly comparable likely that man and large mammals did not co-evolve which ultimately resulted in the extinction of large mammals.