Two Marxist Objections to Exploitation :: Economy Economics Papers

Two Marxist Objections to ExploitationABSTRACT I represent that we can find in Marx two protestations to developing (i) an entitlement expostulation consort to which it is wrongful because of the unjust distri yetion of benefits and burdens it generates and (ii) an expressivist objection holding to which it is objectionable because of the manakin of kind relation it is. The expressivist objection is predicated on a communitarian strand in Marxs thought, whereas the entitlement objection is grounded in a more liberal account of the damage of capitalist exploitation. I conclude by connecting my analysis to the current contestation amidst prop binglents and critics of securities industry socialism. While market socialism could be a vehicle for realizing the values associated with the entitlement objection, this is not true for the expressivist objection. Furthermore, because the entitlement objection does not calculate on a thick creation of the human good, it is in accord with the liberal ideal of political neutrality whereas the expressivist objection is not.In what follows I argue that we can find in Marxs work two objections to exploitation and that distinguishing these objections helps clarify current issues facing socialist political philosophy. The first is an entitlement objection according to which exploitation is wrongful because of the unjust distribution of benefits and burdens it generates. The second is an expressivist objection according to which exploitation is wrongful because of the kind of social relation it is, viz., one in which agents view the needs, vulnerabilities, and capacities of others primarily as a means to their receive private gain. (1) The expressivist objection suggests a normatively thicker, communitarian strand in Marxs thought, whereas the entitlement objection relies on a thinner, more liberal normative account. I conclude by connecting my analysis to the current debate between proponents and critics of market s ocialism. While market socialism could be a vehicle for realizing the values associated with the entitlement objection, this is unlikely the graphic symbol for the expressivist objection. Furthermore, because the entitlement objection does not depend on a thick conception of the human good it fits with the emphasis on political neutrality that is important to liberal thought. Let me provide some context for my account by briefly describing the place of exploitation in Marxs theory of history, the connection between the normative and explanatory roles of exploitation, and the relevance of Marxs theory of exploitation for contemporary social philosophy. For Marx exploitation is a concept of historical generality, applying not only to capitalism, but to feudal and ancient modes of production.